Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: Question on SIGFPE | Date | Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:07:44 +0530 | From | "Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala" <> |
| |
Hi Mr Johnson, Thanks for the mail and sorry for pestering you. Actually the call __setfpucw is not visible anywhere. Should I use _FPU_SETCW(cw) instead of that?
Thanks and Regards SReeram
---Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. -- Copied from a mail
-----Original Message----- From: Richard B. Johnson [mailto:root@chaos.analogic.com] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:56 PM To: Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala Cc: Magnus Naeslund(t); Linux kernel Subject: RE: Question on SIGFPE
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala wrote:
> > Hi Mr Johnson, > Thanks for the mail. Actually I see that there is no fpu_control.h
> in my src. > > Thanks and Regards > SReeram
With more recent C runtime libraries, the header is /usr/include/fpu_control.h instead of /usr/include/i386/fpu_control.h
Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.22 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |