Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:52:01 +0400 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | [UPATCH] force_sig_info() |
| |
Hello.
This is my third attempt:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > 2.5.34 introduced this change in force_sig_info() > > - return send_sig_info(sig, info, t); > + return send_sig_info(sig, (void *)1, t); > > I beleive, it is wrong, info can carry useful information > from do_page_fault, traps. And this (info *)1 does not > prevent send_signal() from allocation of siginfo struct. > Ingo, could you please clarify?
Call me stupid, but i still believe it is bug.
--- linux-2.5.39/kernel/signal.c~ Sun Sep 29 16:37:08 2002 +++ linux-2.5.39/kernel/signal.c Sun Sep 29 16:37:35 2002 @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ recalc_sigpending_tsk(t); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sigmask_lock, flags); - return send_sig_info(sig, (void *)1, t); + return send_sig_info(sig, info, t); } static int Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |