Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rhoads, Rob" <> | Subject | RE: [ANNOUNCE] Linux Hardened Device Drivers Project | Date | Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:29:23 -0700 |
| |
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:46:35PM -0700, Rhoads, Rob wrote: > > > > First throw away any idea of a spec. That was a bad idea. :) > > > > Next, turn the first section, "Stability & Reliability" of our > > original doc into a "Driver Hardening HOWTO". It would be a > > list of characteristics that all good drivers should have, > > packed with examples to back it up. > > Sounds very good. I recommend that it be written in DocBook and added > to the Documentation/DocBook directory of the kernel tree.
Agreed. :-)
> > > BTW, by no means did I or anyone involved on this project, ever > > mean to imply that the current drivers in the kernel are "bad". > > Rather, I'd like to capture a list of the best practices and > > document them. In any event our current list needs to be > > strengthened with concrete examples. My thinking is that we > > should work with the Kernel Janitor project. This is where > > Intel can probably really help out. > > Great, the janitor project can really use extra people to help out. I > suggest that you read over their TODO list again and pick up > the pieces > from there that are missing from your "Driver Hardening HOWTO".
I will do.
[snip]
> > It would be wonderful if there were some good FI tools that were > available for our use. It can only help to make better drivers. > > Thank you for your response, and for listening to the community. > > greg k-h >
-RobR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |