Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:10:14 +0200 (CEST) | From | "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <> | Subject | Re: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage |
| |
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Hi,
> > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you > > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99 > > varargs macros... > > I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.
if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple sample):
#define LOG(level, format, ...) \ log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);
you _need_ to give an argument:
LOG(debug, "blah", 0);
w/o the ", 0" this is an error.
There have been gcc extentions that allow(ed) zero arguments.
*searching*
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html
-- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |