lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:

Hi,

> > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you
> > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99
> > varargs macros...
>
> I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.

if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple
sample):

#define LOG(level, format, ...) \
log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);

you _need_ to give an argument:

LOG(debug, "blah", 0);

w/o the ", 0" this is an error.

There have been gcc extentions that allow(ed) zero arguments.

*searching*

See: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html

--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site