lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage
    On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:

    Hi,

    > > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you
    > > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99
    > > varargs macros...
    >
    > I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.

    if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple
    sample):

    #define LOG(level, format, ...) \
    log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);

    you _need_ to give an argument:

    LOG(debug, "blah", 0);

    w/o the ", 0" this is an error.

    There have been gcc extentions that allow(ed) zero arguments.

    *searching*

    See: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html

    --
    Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
    56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.030 / U:30.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site