lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:-

> > > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you
> > > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99
> > > varargs macros...
> >
> > I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.
>
> if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple
> sample):
>
> #define LOG(level, format, ...) \
> log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);

No, this is only valid C99 if __VA_ARGS__ is the empty list.

I posted the correct way to write this macro about a week ago that
works with all versions of GCC (and follows their documented
behaviour; this stuff *is* all documented).

Neil.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site