Messages in this thread | | | From | "Kostadin Karaivanov" <> | Subject | Re: XFS? | Date | Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:52:50 +0300 |
| |
>I think that it is not fair to insist for merging of XFS only. There ara >many other projects that are of bigger value for linux then iet another >filesystem - RSBAC,OpenMosix,LSM,HTree and more.
LSM is mainstream now OpenMosix si too intrusive (I think) as XFS _used_ to_ be_.....
>Some people like Linus, Alan, Marchelo etc. have the responsibility to >provide users with a usable, stable kernel. >And if somebody doesn't like their way of work he is free to make it's own >kernel tree.
>I am not an expert, just a sysadmin, and I am testing XFS since kernel >2.4.6 ( I am writing this mail from a test machine with kernel 2.4.18 >and XFS root filesystem ), and I also think that XFS is not ready for >production ( I lost some unimportant files after a crash yesterday ).
You missing the point again, "ready" does _not_ means "stable" I use XFS on allmost all of my PC/Servers and I never ever lose a single dot in any file on my XFS partitions
>And after all do you think that such kind of presure over kernel >maintainers is the way of making free software.
Kostadin Karaivanov Senior System Administrator @ Ministry Of Finace tel: +359 2 98592062 larry@minfin.government.bg
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |