![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Aug 06 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > > >... > > try a work load that excercises the block i/o layer alone (O_DIRECT, > > raw, whatnot) and then compare 2.4 and 2.5. ibm had some slides on this > > from ols, unfortunately I don't know if they have then online. > >... > > Pages 390-406 in > > http://www.linux.org.uk/~ajh/ols2002_proceedings.pdf.gz > > or are you talking about something different? Right thanks, exactly those. Table 3 on page 395 is the one I noted. Forget readv, as that hasn't been done in 2.5 yet. I'd say a 2.5.17 untweaked kernel beating 2.4 tweaked beyond recognition isn't too shabby for a devel series kernel. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:22 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||