Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 18 Aug 2002 03:46:07 +0200 (CEST) | From | venom@sns ... | Subject | Re: Does Solaris really scale this well? |
| |
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Dax Kelson wrote:
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:53:16 -0600 (MDT) > From: Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com> > To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Does Solaris really scale this well? > > > From: > > http://www.itworld.com/Man/3828/020816mcnealy/ > > Scott McNealy: > > "When you take a 99-way UltraSPARC III machine and add a 100th processor, > you get 94 percent linear scalability. You can't get 94 percent linear > scalability on your first Intel chip. It's very, very hard to do, and they > have not done it."
you can't get 94% linear scalability also on Sparc III, to say the truth...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |