Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:58:15 +0100 | From | Anton Altaparmakov <> | Subject | RE: 2.5.28 and partitions |
| |
At 23:47 31/07/02, Matt_Domsch@Dell.com wrote: > > Maybe we need to roll our own? > >What's wrong with EFI GUID scheme (GPT) (other than it wasn't invented by >Linux folks)? [snip] >Unless there's something that GPT doesn't do well, I'd prefer not to make >yet another partitioning scheme. If there is something else it needs, it >can be extended.
And if there is something GPT doesn't do then there is Veritas LDM (also used in simplified form by Windows LDM) and the kernel understands it today. Admittedly none of the Linux partitioning tools support it yet but that is subject to change. (-; LDM is journalled, supports large numbers of disks, huge disks, all sorts of RAID, etc... I don't think you will find anything missing in that one...
So I fully agree that inventing yet another partitioning scheme is silly in view of the multitude of existing ones which do the job just fine. Feel free to prove me I am wrong by showing me something that GPT/LDM can't do...
Best regards,
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |