Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:54:27 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: PATCH/RFC: fix 2.5.20 ramdisk |
| |
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:54:14AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > --- orig/drivers/block/rd.c Wed May 29 21:40:26 2002 > > +++ linux/drivers/block/rd.c Tue Jun 4 09:44:21 2002 > > @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ > > { > > struct address_space * mapping; > > unsigned long index; > > + unsigned int vec_offset; > > Just a small nit. Shouldn't taht be size_t ?
I really don't see where you got that thought from. A bio_vec is:
struct bio_vec { struct page *bv_page; unsigned int bv_len; unsigned int bv_offset; };
bv_offset is unsigned int. Therefore, vec_offset should be likewise.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |