Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 04 Jun 2002 10:08:49 +0200 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: PATCH/RFC: fix 2.5.20 ramdisk |
| |
Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:54:14AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > >>>--- orig/drivers/block/rd.c Wed May 29 21:40:26 2002 >>>+++ linux/drivers/block/rd.c Tue Jun 4 09:44:21 2002 >>>@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ >>> { >>> struct address_space * mapping; >>> unsigned long index; >>>+ unsigned int vec_offset; >> >>Just a small nit. Shouldn't taht be size_t ? > > > I really don't see where you got that thought from. A bio_vec is: > > struct bio_vec { > struct page *bv_page; > unsigned int bv_len; > unsigned int bv_offset; > }; > > bv_offset is unsigned int. Therefore, vec_offset should be likewise.
Ahh. Of course I see. Thank you for explaining.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |