Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: Typo in arch/mips/dec/wbflush.c | Date | Wed, 26 Jun 2002 02:48:20 +1000 |
| |
In message <20020624215505.GA7864@galileo> you write: > --- linux.orig-2.4.19-rc1/arch/mips/dec/wbflush.c Fri Oct 5 13:06:51 200 1 > +++ linux/arch/mips/dec/wbflush.c Mon Jun 24 15:49:53 2002 > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ > } > > /* > - * The DS500/2x0 doesnt need to write back the WB. > + * The DS500/2x0 doesn't need to write back the WB. > */ > static void wbflush_kn03(void) > {
Hmm...
I've only applied the one that was an actually a definite spellfix. While I prefer to use apostrophes, it's a common abbreviation to skip it: 1/10 according to google. Compare with another common misspelling (recieve) which is 1/50.
Given there is a non-zero cost (patch conflict with developers) even with trivial patches, I've decided not to apply your 41 "doesnt"->"doesn't" patches, unless someone convinces me otherwise.
Cheers, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |