Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?] | Date | Wed, 1 May 2002 17:42:40 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 02 May 2002 17:35, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:33AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > At the moment I use the contig memory model (so we only use discontig for > > NUMA support) but I may need to change that in the future. > > I wasn't thinking at numa-q, but regardless numa-Q fits perfectly into > the current discontigmem-numa model too as far I can see.
No it doesn't. The config_discontigmem model forces all zone_normal memory to be on node zero, so all the remaining nodes can only have highmem locally. Even with good cache hardware, this has to hurt.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |