Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 May 2002 09:00:47 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?] |
| |
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:34:02PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > alpha is the same as mips I think. sparc would be the same too if > there's any discontigmem sparc. Dunno of arm. We're talking about > architectures needing discontigmem, 99% percent of users doesn't need > discontigmem in the first place, you never need discontigmem in x86 and > even in new-numa you don't need discontigmem, you want to pass through > discontigmem only to get the numa topology description that the current > discontigmem provides via the pgdat.
Any chance you could name a few of these mysterious new NUMA machines?
Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |