![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Martin Dalecki wrote: > The only problem is that having a shared lock between two queues apparently > doesn't imply that the queues are behaving atomic on the request level > among each others. Correct - both queues can be active with I/O in flight at the same time. But think about it: if this weren't the case, then the older kernels (using global io_request_lock) would have had to serialize ALL I/O, one request-queue active at a time, for every single block-device... > Apparenty the "sublimation" of the hwgroup and overall cleanup of > data structures, just made many people awake and be aware of problems which > where there already for a very very long time... I'm not quite sure which problems you mean. The busy flag prevents any clash. (But sure, if you change to per-device queues AND you ditch the busy flag you're screwed.) Where is the problem? cheers Neil - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:26 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||