![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I've got a few of those around, I'll see if I can reproduce it. How many >> cpu's did you need to bring it out? On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:48:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > 2 physical - but i'd suggest to test Erich's patch instead. I had > debugging code in the scheduler which did printks, which slowed down some > of the operations in question, such as the startup of the idle thread - > which created weird situations. [which might not occur in normal testing, > but which are possible nevertheless.] That's not many. I'll try it on a bigger one, with a few big fat printk's in idle task startup and see if I can bring it down. It's an interesting little tidbit of programming. As I said earlier, Erich's patch already passed my testing. Thanks though. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||