lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] migration thread fix
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I've got a few of those around, I'll see if I can reproduce it. How many
>> cpu's did you need to bring it out?

On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:48:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 2 physical - but i'd suggest to test Erich's patch instead. I had
> debugging code in the scheduler which did printks, which slowed down some
> of the operations in question, such as the startup of the idle thread -
> which created weird situations. [which might not occur in normal testing,
> but which are possible nevertheless.]

That's not many. I'll try it on a bigger one, with a few big fat printk's
in idle task startup and see if I can bring it down. It's an interesting
little tidbit of programming.

As I said earlier, Erich's patch already passed my testing. Thanks though.


Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.055 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site