![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
At some point in the past, I wrote: >>> looks perfectly good to me. Even with wli's patch i saw some migration >>> thread initialization weirdnesses. On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> It's a bit of a moot point, but I'd be interested in knowing what sort >> of weirdnesses those might be for my own edification. On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:41:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > a HT box wouldnt boot without an artificial mdelay(1000) in > migration_init() - while i havent fully debugged it (given Erich's patch), > it appeared to be some sort of race between idle thread startup and > migration init. I've got a few of those around, I'll see if I can reproduce it. How many cpu's did you need to bring it out? Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:25 [W:0.113 / U:0.640 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||