Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:22:07 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters? |
| |
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Pau Aliagas wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Pau Aliagas wrote: > > > > > I'd recommend everybody to give arch a try. > > > > If you could setup a public arch repository of the 2.4 / 2.5 > > kernel of which everybody can copy/clone their arch kernel > > repository, that would be a good start. > > It is not necessary to setup a central repository. > > We need a reference archive to keep in sync with; then everybody > branches from there and syncs back and forth.
Exactly! Now, is there some arch fan willing to setup this initial repository ?
> > That would give us some real way to compare the two tools. > > It seems obvious that bitkeeper is in very good shape; I'm not at all > against people using, but I'm sure that if a few people tried arch, > they'd be gratefully surprised.
Having an initial repository would get a lot of people (including me, once I have a bit of time) to try out arch.
regards,
Rik -- <insert bitkeeper endorsement here>
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |