Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.4.19pre1aa1 | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 02 Mar 2002 15:58:21 -0500 |
| |
On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 15:47, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:57:49PM -0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > > If rmap is really better than current VM, it will be merged into head > > development branch (2.5). There is no anti-rmap conspiracy :-) > > Indeed.
Of note: I don't think anyone "loses" if one VM is merged or not. A reverse mapping VM is a significant redesign of our current VM approach and if it proves better, yes, I suspect (and hope) it will be merged into 2.5.
But that doesn't mean the 2.4 VM is worse, per se.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |