Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:36:51 +0100 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: ext3 and undeletion |
| |
> True, and it could to tricks like listing space used for undelete as "free" > in addition to dynamic garbage collection. > > Though, with a daemon checking the dirs often, or using Daniel's idea of a > socket between unlink() in glibc and an undelete daemon could work quite > similairly. > > Also, there wouldn't be any interaction with filesystem internals, and > userspace would probably work better with non-posix type filesystems (vfat, > hfs, etc) too. > > IOW, there seems to be little gain to having an kernelspace solution. >
IMNSHO everyone thinking about undeletion in Linux should be sentenced to 1 year of VMS usage and asked then again if he still think's that it's a good idea...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |