Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 3 Feb 2002 00:58:19 +0100 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.3 - (IDE) hda: drive not ready for command errors |
| |
On Sun, Feb 03 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > > what we are trying to get away from but we really need a way to stream the > > pointers to the data register cleanly. Otherwise the benefits of the zero > > copy in block go away. > > ?? Your point is not clear. zero copy what, request struct?! That would > be way below measurable.
Sorry, I see what you mean, was a bit too quick. To me the current code looks ok in this regard, I don't see any problems with that. If you have noticed a problem please out line it and I'll take a look tomorrow. Now, bed time.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |