lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.5.3 - (IDE) hda: drive not ready for command errors
On Sat, Feb 02 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Jens,
>
> You and I know Linus will go ballistic over the reintroduction of a
> working copy model using rq scratch pad. We can go with this return to

No I don't think so, I'd be surprised if Linus cared about that at all.

> what we are trying to get away from but we really need a way to stream the
> pointers to the data register cleanly. Otherwise the benefits of the zero
> copy in block go away.

?? Your point is not clear. zero copy what, request struct?! That would
be way below measurable.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:23    [W:0.188 / U:1.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site