[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9
Pavel Machek wrote:
>>While we're talking about printk()... is there any reason *not* to
>>rename it printf()?
> I believe printf() is good idea. I put printk() into userland programs
> too many times now, and used printf() too many times from kernel.

The only reason I can think of *not* to call it printf() is that you may
want to do something for userspace testing like:

#define printk(X, Y...) fprintf(stderr, X, ## Y)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.037 / U:3.180 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site