[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9
    Pavel Machek wrote:
    >>While we're talking about printk()... is there any reason *not* to
    >>rename it printf()?
    > I believe printf() is good idea. I put printk() into userland programs
    > too many times now, and used printf() too many times from kernel.

    The only reason I can think of *not* to call it printf() is that you may
    want to do something for userspace testing like:

    #define printk(X, Y...) fprintf(stderr, X, ## Y)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.022 / U:226.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site