Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:42:34 +0000 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] SCSI on non-ISA systems |
| |
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:22:55PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Russell King wrote: > > This isn't actually the original purpose of CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA (it > > was to allow an architecture to provide ISA-like DMA without having to > > use the ISA DMA request/free functions - eg, they need to claim interrupts > > on request_dma() and free them on free_dma()). > > Then what's the correct(TM) fix? Unconditionally #define > CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA, so it behaves like before?
Probably the correct answer is to get everyone to use an explicit release function and just kill scsi_host_generic_release() entirely.
However, I'm sure other people will have differing views on that.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |