Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation | From | Daniel Egger <> | Date | 24 Oct 2002 20:10:03 +0200 |
| |
Am Don, 2002-10-24 um 19.15 schrieb Manfred Spraul:
> Attached is a test app that compares several memory copy implementations. > Could you run it and report the results to me, together with cpu, > chipset and memory type?
SiS 735, Duron 1200, 512 MB PC133 (running at 100Mhz).
Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $
copy_page() tests copy_page function 'warm up run' took 19860 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 21205 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 21262 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 19893 cycles per page copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 12746 cycles per page copy_page function 'even_faster' took 13112 cycles per page copy_page function 'no_prefetch' took 10217 cycles per page
Being interested in seeing how the Via Ezra system here performs I also ran it there but experienced three segfaults in the last three tests; two of which I can explain, but no_prefetch is a stranger right now. Anyway:
PLE133, Via Ezra 667 Mhz, 128 MB PC100 (probably at 66Mhz) egger@tanja:~$ ./athlon Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $
copy_page() tests copy_page function 'warm up run' took 23213 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 34971 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 34958 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 22774 cycles per page
-- Servus, Daniel [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |