Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:27:17 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable |
| |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:07:55AM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote: > Ok so the medicine is worse than the disease. I take it that you only want > some key points made for rescheduling instead of the full preempt patch by > Robert. That seems logical enough. The only issue i see is that for the
My ideal is to have the kernel to be as low worst latency as -preempt, but without being preemptive. that's possible to achieve, I don't think we're that far.
mean latency is another matter, but I personally don't mind about mean latency and I much prefer to save cpu cycles instead.
Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |