lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4.17 vs 2.2.19 vs rml new VM
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 brian@worldcontrol.com wrote:

> I tried rmap-10 new VM and under my typical load my desktop machine
> froze repeatedly. Seemed the memory pool was going down the drain
> before the freeze. Meaning apps were failing and getting stuck in
> various odd states.

There's a stupid logic inversion bug in rmap-10, which is
fixed in rmap-10a. Andrew Morton tracked it down about an
hour after I released rmap-10.

Basically in wakeup_kswapd() user processes go to sleep
if the pressure on the VM is _really_ high *and* the user
process has all the same GFP options set as kswapd itself,
so the process can sleep on kswapd.

if ((gfp_mask & GFP_KSWAPD) == GFP_KSWAPD)
return;

Thinking about it, rmap-10a doesn't do the right thing,
either, releasing patches at 4 am isn't the right thing ;)

In vmscan.c, line 707 _should_ be:

if ((gfp_mask & GFP_KSWAPD) != GFP_KSWAPD)
return;

This way tasks which cannot safely sleep on kswapd will
return immediately, allowing only tasks which _can_
sleep on kswapd to go for a break.

Oh well, time for testing and releasing rmap-11 ;)

regards,

Rik
--
Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.547 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site