![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> I find the low latency patch makes a noticeable > difference in e.g. q3a and rtcw - OTOH I have > not been able to discern any tangible difference > from the stock kernel when using -preempt. The measurements I've seen put lowlatency ahead of pre-empt in quality of results. Since low latency fixes some of the locked latencies it might be interesting for someone with time to benchmark vanilla low latency pre-empt both together - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||