Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.17 vs 2.2.19 vs rml new VM | Date | Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:50:02 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> I find the low latency patch makes a noticeable > difference in e.g. q3a and rtcw - OTOH I have > not been able to discern any tangible difference > from the stock kernel when using -preempt.
The measurements I've seen put lowlatency ahead of pre-empt in quality of results. Since low latency fixes some of the locked latencies it might be interesting for someone with time to benchmark
vanilla low latency pre-empt both together - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |