Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Jan 2002 04:26:40 +0100 (CET) | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems? |
| |
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> One of my background assumptions is that the older a machine is, the > more likely it is that the person doing the config will have a clue about > what they're doing.
Bzzzzt. See Greg Hennessy's post. (Not that I'm implying he hasn't a clue, but he makes a good point)
> These days hardware is so cheap that only geeks try to cram Linux onto > old systems
Bzzzzzt. Linux is getting deployed in lots of small businesses running mailservers/firewalls etc on old P90's and the likes. Not because they're run by geeks, but because they're running on a low budget.
> Thus I'm not very worried about DMI read failing on older hardware.
It fails on newer hardware too. The Vaio I quoted is less than a year old. The CyrixIII BIOS is less than 6 months old.
> My main objective is to make configuration painless on modern PCI-only > hardware -- which is why I want to be able to tell when there are no > ISA slots, so I can deep-six questions about ISA drivers.
Go down the DMI path, and get it right _sometimes_, or take a zero. Getting it right sometimes is likely to do more harm than good.
> > o The geek next door who wants to tinker and learn about the kernel. > > Said geek is going to learn a damn sight more currently than he will > > with a dumbed down pointy clicky "build me a kernel" button. > > Your "they must show willingness to suffer pain, otherwise they're not worthy" > attitude is really showing here.
Crap. I'm implying that there should be a learning curve to everything no matter how small it may be. You're trying to remove the curve altogether.
> Yes. But *I* want Aunt Tilley to be able to download the latest kernel > sources and build/install them herself, without ever feeling that the task > is beyond her capabilities.
*shakes head*, ok I'm all done trying to argue this one.
> I believe we need to learn the discipline of useability and take it seriously. > Because talk plus code is much more convincing than just talk, I'm trying > to demonstrate this by coding. But I'll talk about it too :-).
And write a book perchance ? SCNR 8-)
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |