lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Err, not quite the whole story. It is *never* right to leave the disk
> sitting idle while there are dirty, writable IO buffers.

Define "idle" ?

Is idle the time it takes between two readahead requests
to be issued, delaying the second request because you
just moved the disk arm away ?

Is idle when we haven't had a request for, say, 3 disk
seek time periods ?

Is idle when we won't be getting any request soon for the
area where the disk arm is hanging out ? (and how do we
know the future?)

regards,

Rik
--
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site