Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: kernel threads | Date | Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:37:00 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> schedule the call to kernel_thread using tq_schedule
You still want to use daemonzie
> - is there no need to call daemonize in the second variant - if yes why?
A task always has a parent, it'll just be a random task that ran the kernel_thread request - in fact it might be a kernel thread and then I dont guarantee what will occur. In fact I wouldnt try the tq_schedule one
> - can i do both variants during interupt time (when there is no valid > current)?
No, but you can create a thread ready in case its needed then wake it from an IRQ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |