Messages in this thread | | | From | Denis Perchine <> | Subject | Re: fsync vs fdatasync on Linux | Date | Sun, 18 Feb 2001 18:41:59 +0600 |
| |
On Sunday 18 February 2001 18:22, Denis Perchine wrote: > Hello, > > as fas as I can see from fdatasync man page, and from the latest kernel > sources (2.4.1ac3, fs/buffer.c), they are equivalent. > > Using of fdatasync in database can gain significant gain on systems which > supports it (on HP it gains up to 25% with pg_bench on PostgreSQL 7.1b5). > > Are there any plans to implement this correctly? And due to what problems > it was not implemented yet?
Forget this crap. Seems I missed these lines: err = file->f_op->fsync(file, dentry, 0); err = file->f_op->fsync(file, dentry, 1);
-- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine
---------------------------------- E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/ FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5 ---------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |