lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subjectfsync vs fdatasync on Linux
Date
Hello,

as fas as I can see from fdatasync man page, and from the latest kernel
sources (2.4.1ac3, fs/buffer.c), they are equivalent.

Using of fdatasync in database can gain significant gain on systems which
supports it (on HP it gains up to 25% with pg_bench on PostgreSQL 7.1b5).

Are there any plans to implement this correctly? And due to what problems it
was not implemented yet?

--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site