Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 30 Sep 2000 16:27:45 +0200 | From | Marc Lehmann <> | Subject | Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? |
| |
> to spot it, and ditto with any others who do the same. If everyone could have > agreed a name for the kernel compiler that would be even better.
Sorry, I was probably unclear as I wasn't about the name of the compiler, nor the neccissity of using an outdated gcc version for kernel compiles.
> As to compatibility I am told by folks working on the gnu C/C++ that library > level compatibility should be 100% between 2.96+ and 3.0 while 2.95 is an > isolated incompatible pseudo-release at C++ level.
The problem is not the library level but the ABI that did change and will change, which is widely known and should have been pointed out by your informants :(
Anyway, this is really starting to be off-topic, sorry..
-- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |