Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Wine speedup through kernel module | Date | Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:54:29 +0100 | From | David Howells <> |
| |
Oliver Neukum <Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de> wrote: > > I think now that I'm probably best providing a generic pluggable syscall > > handler, one that is very careful to make sure the syscall can't be entered > > whilst the module is being unloaded. > > This seems to me the best idea. However I would argue against dynamically > allocating syscalls. Reserving numbers makes for better code and allows you > to do autoloading.
Now there's an idea... have the kernel autoload modules based on a particular syscall number being handled in that module. Madness *grin*.
You still have to have a static syscall number though...
David Howells - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |