[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?
    On Wed Jul 26, 2000 at 04:35:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > >If you've already got a filesystem, may I recommend you drop cramfs,
    > > >and use jffs over readonly compressed loopback? That way you don't
    > > >need the cramfs code (or its in-built limitations)
    > >
    > > Ehh..
    > >
    > > At least cramfs works. I have about ten reports of loopback not working
    > > lately, and I'm likely to disable it completely unless somebody steps in
    > > to maintain the damn thing.
    > Cramfs is ugly, but JFFS over compressed loopback is not the answer. Philipp
    > Rumpf did a compression hack for JFFS so you can just run pure JFFS over
    > MTD. For an embedded box combine that with RAMFS and you can ifdef out the
    > entire block layer.

    Unless you use disk-on-module (flash that plugs into an IDE connector),
    since JFFS is no longer capable of working with a block device...


    Erik B. Andersen Web:
    --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.020 / U:6.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site