Messages in this thread | | | From | nathan.zook@amd ... | Subject | RE: [OT] fpu IRQ x86-ism | Date | Mon, 6 Mar 2000 15:59:14 -0600 |
| |
I like to call it "unforward design".
Nathan
> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@transmeta.com]
> nathan.zook@amd.com wrote: > > > > I work for AMD. Which means "we" do. =:-O > > > > Do you emulate compatibility mode over at Transmeta? > > > > This was a discussion on linux-kernel, so "we" logically > imply Linux. I > wasn't talking about CPUs or chipsets. > > Someone's comment after I described this to them: "Intel -- putting > `backwards' into `backwards compatible'..." > > -hpa > > -- > <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! > "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |