lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subjectparide_protocol alias
Does anyone have any strong opinions about this patch?  The idea is to
have something like bpck demand-loaded (if kmod is configured) when pcd
tries to initialises.

The current situation requires pre/post-install rules if you want to use
modules, and (for reasons outlined before on this list) that's not really
much good.

Tim.
*/

Index: linux/drivers/block/paride/paride.c
diff -u linux/drivers/block/paride/paride.c:1.1.1.2 linux/drivers/block/paride/paride.c:1.2
--- linux/drivers/block/paride/paride.c:1.1.1.2 Tue Oct 5 08:46:45 1999
+++ linux/drivers/block/paride/paride.c Mon Mar 20 16:40:24 2000
@@ -336,6 +336,9 @@

s = protocol; e = s+1;

+ if (!protocols[0])
+ request_module ("paride_protocol");
+
if (autoprobe) {
s = 0;
e = MAX_PROTOS;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.023 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site