Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:41:09 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: in2000 |
| |
Philip Blundell wrote: > > In message <20000319181942.A1788@thepuffingroup.com>, willy@thepuffingroup.com > writes: > >On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 08:51:59PM +0000, Philip Blundell wrote: > >> This driver also contains i386 assembler. Luckily, there are generic > >> equivalents provided too, so just a gentle nudge in the right direction is > >> enough. > >> +#ifdef __i386__ > > > >i thought CONFIG_X86 was preferred these days? > > On what basis? > > CONFIG_X86 is longer, uglier, requires <linux/config.h> to be included (and > hence generates an extra dependency).
Is '__i386__' guaranteed to -exactly the same- platforms that CONFIG_X86 covers?
-- Jeff Garzik | Tact is the ability to tell a man Building 1024 | he has an open mind when he has a MandrakeSoft, Inc. | hole in his head. (-random fortune)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |