Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: in2000 | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:15:08 +0000 | From | Philip Blundell <> |
| |
In message <20000319181942.A1788@thepuffingroup.com>, willy@thepuffingroup.com writes: >On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 08:51:59PM +0000, Philip Blundell wrote: >> This driver also contains i386 assembler. Luckily, there are generic >> equivalents provided too, so just a gentle nudge in the right direction is >> enough. >> +#ifdef __i386__ > >i thought CONFIG_X86 was preferred these days?
On what basis?
CONFIG_X86 is longer, uglier, requires <linux/config.h> to be included (and hence generates an extra dependency).
p.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |