Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Help in DSM design | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2000 18:22:38 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <Pine.LNX.3.95.1000310143601.587A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>, "Richa rd B. Johnson" writes: +----- | > Mach, so it could be). WinNT was based on Mach, but is going to monolytic | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | Ermmm. Win/NT was based upon VAX/VMS. The principal designer of VAX/VMS +--->8
OS/2 with VAX/VMS features layered on top of it. Don't believe (many people have bought Microsoft's attempt to rewrite history hook, line, and sinker)? Run strings on the kernel and many of the device drivers --- many of them still *claim* to be OS/2. Also, boot-time NT failures tend to reveal its origins strongly to those with OS/2 experience.
-- brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |