Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:41:56 -0500 (EST) | From | "Richard B. Johnson" <> | Subject | Re: Help in DSM design |
| |
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Paul Jakma <paul.jakma@compaq.com> said: > > [...] > > > correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't all the SysVR4 derived unices > > (T64/IRIX/Solaris/Unixware) using Mach based kernels? And MacOS X too? > > All monolytic, except possibly MacOS X (don't know that one, and I remember > Apple's Linux was on Mach, because they wanted to build their OS based on > Mach, so it could be). WinNT was based on Mach, but is going to monolytic ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ermmm. Win/NT was based upon VAX/VMS. The principal designer of VAX/VMS was publicly-announced by Micro$oft to be the designer of the NT kernel. There were no secrets. M$ had such a poor reputation because of Windo{{{{ {{{zz ... that they wanted to make sure that the world knew that they had acquired an expert for the "New Technology" OS.
Cheers, Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.3.41 on an i686 machine (800.63 BogoMips).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |