[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subject2.4.0-test5 bug: invalid "shmid_kernel" passed to "shm_nopage_core"
    I've been chasing after a bug in 2.4.0-test5 that I can't quite nail
    down. I don't see anything obvious between test5 and test11 that
    leads me to believe it's been fixed.

    I encountered a lockup on my SMP box. One CPU got stuck in a spinlock
    via the following call trace. There were enough args and saved
    registers on the stack for me to reconstruct a few of the calls:

    valid_swaphandles(entry=c218b268, offset=c68e7e78)
    shm_nopage_core(shp=c218b240, idx=0, address=40014000)
    sys_ipc (at call to sys_shmat)

    "valid_swaphandles" locked on the:


    and it's not surprising it did. The SWP_TYPE(entry) was swapfile
    index 52 on my 2-swapfile system, so it was spinning on some random
    piece of memory.

    In "shm_nopage", the code

    if(!(shp = shm_lock(inode->i_ino)))

    got a "shp" of 0xc218b240. For some reason, this wasn't a valid
    "shp", because in "shm_nopage_core", the

    pte = SHM_ENTRY(shp,idx); // in our case, shp->shm_dir[0][0]

    returned 0xc218b268 (i.e., the value of &shp->shm_dir, so maybe
    shp->shm_dir was a pointer to itself---not possible if "shp" pointed
    to a valid "struct shmid_kernel").

    The SHM locking has thwarted my attempts at understanding. Maybe
    someone else can see the bug or reassure me that it's already been
    fixed in test11?

    Kevin <>
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.028 / U:29.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site