Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Auto-Adaptive scheduler - Final chapter ( the numbers ) ... | From | Vandoorselaere Yoann <> | Date | 28 Jan 2000 16:05:10 +0100 |
| |
"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@maticad.it> writes:
> I prefer to give a single response to points emerged in this thread. > > > Steve say : > > I really do urge you to go to a bookstore, find a recent book on computer > > architecture, and try to find out how a modern machine works. Larry > > recommended a book. Maybe you should try that one. > > Larry say : > > > : However, I think that Davide knows something about caches as well. > > > Hmm. With no offense intended, that's certainly not at all clear from > > this discussion. What is it that makes you think that? > > I really like that guys that having read the last Intel ( or Digital. etc > ... ) data sheet, > thinks to be God in earth, at a point to judge the knowledge of other guys. > I really like them.
Agree, we will never succeed in our task by acting like this... This is the problem encountered by many computer engineers because of their ego...
:-(
-- -- Yoann, http://www.security-addict.org It is well known that M$ products don't call free() after a malloc(). The Unix community wish them good luck for their future developments.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |