Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 08 Jul 1999 23:16:18 -0400 | From | Dave Cinege <> | Subject | Glibc2.1 == libc7 !! |
| |
Somebody has got to die. (Yeah this is off topic. TOUGH!)
Can anyone give me SOME reason why glibc 2.1 is not formally linked as libc7 under Linux? For the most part things compiled on glibc seg fault if run against glibc 2.0. Now glibc 2.0 and 2.1 could peacefully co exist IF glibc 2.1 specific programs as linked as /lib/libc7.
Same problem with the devel includes. I need to compile for strictly glibc 2.0 for a platform for AT LEAST the next 6 months. Life is going to be hell. I need to hand fit all the junk instead of a pretty altdev debian package like with libc5.
Who's fuck up is this?!?! Let them come forth and be scourged to death!
-- http://www.linuxrouter.org/ Linux Router Project
Considering the country's population, of 230 million people, the U.S. government agencies maintain an average of 15 files on every man, woman, and child in this country.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |