Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Jul 1999 05:44:16 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Mike A. Harris" <> | Subject | Re: LINUX |
| |
On Thu, 1 Jul 1999, Jonathan Walther wrote:
>My method, matching the Sender: header or whicher is appropriate to the >list, is still superior.
You are arguing that your method is superior, when my method has not lost a single Linux kernel message in 2 years since I've been on the list. Pointless...
>It is cleaner and easier to understand, and doesn't depend on >mysterious macros.
There is nothing mysterious about the macro at all. Read the documentation.
>I notice your macro doesn't handle "Sender:" fields.
It is not my macro. It is built into procmail. Someone suggested that I use it, as it works well, and after I discovered it, I tried it out on several mailing lists for which I could not get every single message to filter properly, and the TO macro did it perfectly.
>:0 >* ^Sender:.*owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu >linux-kernel
Good for you.
-- Mike A. Harris Linux advocate GNU advocate Computer Consultant Open Source advocate
Tea, Earl Grey, Hot...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |