Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Date | 21 Jun 1999 09:40:35 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net> writes:
Dan> On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Zach Brown wrote: >> what happens when we look up and openldap is slow as reported by MS >> benchmarks? INN? sendmail/qmail/postfix? the solution is to >> update the userland daemons to use 'modern' apis and methodologies >> and such, not to punt and put the protocol in the kernel. The >> former is what apache 2.0 will do, I hope.
Dan> So where do you draw the line between userspace nfsd and Dan> kernelspace knfsd? How is this any different from khttpd?
I already mentioned this but you didn't care to look obviously, Olaf Kirch did a paper on knfsd.
ttp://www.tux.org/pub/net/olaf-kirch/expo97-paper.tar.gz it's a LaTeX file, I didn't find a PostScript version of it. Though I am almost sure I've seen it around somewhere.
Jes
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |