Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Jun 1999 14:27:41 -0700 (PDT) | From | Dan Hollis <> | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about |
| |
On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Zach Brown wrote: > what happens when we look up and openldap is slow as reported by MS > benchmarks? INN? sendmail/qmail/postfix? > the solution is to update the userland daemons to use 'modern' apis and > methodologies and such, not to punt and put the protocol in the kernel. > The former is what apache 2.0 will do, I hope.
So where do you draw the line between userspace nfsd and kernelspace knfsd? How is this any different from khttpd?
*Boggle*.
-Dan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |