Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Jun 1999 18:31:26 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: 2.3 wish: integrate pcmcia into mainstream kernel |
| |
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > WHAT install disk? > > The install disk that is the floppy image that makes the CD-Rom > bootable? > > El Torrito spec... You have a bootable disk image. It's > generally a floppy image although I understand it CAN be a larger > hard drive image (haven't seen one in practice).
Right. It _can_.
It's not a question of "possible" vs "impossible". It's a question of "practical" vs "impractical" and a question of verification.
The verification part comes in through the fact that the way things are set up right now, nobody _ever_ uses the PCMCIA package the same way during installation as they use it in everyday use. Basically, right now the everyday use gets tested every day, and the installation use gets tested once in a blue moon, if even that.
Anybody surprised that there are problems at install time? Not me.
In contrast, the regular built-in device drivers almost never have any trouble at installation time, because they have been extremely heavily tested every single bootup to make sure that they always find the device reliably. They are known to not need any special parameters in 99% of all cases.
If you look at the PCMCIA stuff, because of how it is set up, special parameters are _accepted_ and considered to be perfectly fine. And that means that they tend to flourish, rather than be frowned upon. All of which means that installation is painful - once it is all installed it works beautifully.
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |