[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Possible security hole? [was: verify_area(...) possible problem]

> > This is a known problem, it is pretty much similar to what happened under 2.0
> > for all all architectures, not just the i386 and one of reasons for the new
> > user space access stuff introduced from 2.1.4 on. Now that only the 386 is still
> > affected just nobody bothered because on the 386 there are other funnies left
> > which may make running a system used by possibly hostile users a bad idea.
> s/386/some very early stepping 386, which are only a small fraction
> of the existing 386ers/.
> So it is really not a big problem.

Afaik, even very modern 386s contain popad bug which allows any user
to lock processor hard. There is even check for that bug in asm/bugs.h
(by me :-).

PS: My amd 386/40 certainly has popad bug.
I'm really Pavel
Look at ;-).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean